Title of article
HIV incidence among injecting drug users in New York City syringe-exchange programmes
Author/Authors
Don C Des Jarlais، نويسنده , , Michael Marmor، نويسنده , , Denise Paone، نويسنده , , Stephen Titus، نويسنده , , Qiuhu Shi، نويسنده , , Theresa Perlis، نويسنده , , Benny Jose، نويسنده , , Samuel R. Friedman، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1996
Pages
5
From page
987
To page
991
Abstract
Background
There have been no studies showing that participation in programmes which provide legal access to drug-injection equipment leads to individual-level protection against incident HIV infection. We have compared HIV incidence among injecting drug users participating in syringe-exchange programmes in New York City with that among non-participants.
Methods
We used meta-analytic techniques to combine HIV incidence data from injecting drug users in three studies: the Syringe Exchange Evaluation (n=280), in which multiple interviews and saliva samples were collected from participants at exchange sites; the Vaccine Preparedness Initiative cohort (n=133 continuing exchangers and 188 non-exchangers, in which participants were interviewed and tested for HIV every 3 months; and very-high-seroprevalence cities in the National AIDS Demonstration Research (NADR) programme (n=1029), in which street-recruited individuals were interviewed and tested for HIV every 6 months. In practice, participants in the NADR study had not used syringe exchanges.
Findings
HIV incidence among continuing exchange-users in the Syringe Exchange Evaluation was 1•58 per 100 person-years at risk (95% CI 0•54, 4•65) and among continuing exchange-users in the Vaccine Preparedness Initiative it was 1•38 per 100 person-years at risk (0•23, 4•57). Incidence among non-users of the exchange in the Vaccine Preparedness Initiative was 5 26 per 100 person-years at risk (2•41, 11•49), and in the NADR cities, 6•23 per 100 person-years at risk (4•4, 8•6). In a pooled-data, multivariate proportional-hazards analysis, not using the exchanges was associated with a hazard ratio of 3 35 (95% CI 1•29, 8•65) for incident HIV infection compared with using the exchanges.
Interpretation
We observed an individual-level protective effect against HIV infection associated with participation in a syringe-exchange programme. Sterile injection equipment should be legally provided to reduce the risk of HIV infection in persons who inject illicit drugs.
Journal title
The Lancet
Serial Year
1996
Journal title
The Lancet
Record number
571686
Link To Document