The ‘hows’, ‘whos’, and ‘whens’ of screening: gynaecologists’ perspectives on cervical cancer screening in urban Sweden

Population-based screening has contributed to decreased mortality in cervical cancer. However, the ‘hows’, ‘whos’ and ‘whens’ of screening still concern health professionals and policy makers. As part of a research project aimed at examining a population-based cervical cancer screening program (PCCSP) from different stakeholders’ perspectives, the aim of this qualitative interview study was to elucidate the views of gynaecologists, working in both public and private settings, as stakeholders in the PCCSP in the county of Stockholm, Sweden. Results from semi structured interviews with 17 physicians indicate ambiguity in their descriptions of the purpose of both the PCCSP and smear testing in general, leading to different views about appropriate time intervals for Pap-smear testing. The gynaecologists also described experiencing a number of dilemmas related to information content and provision—both prior to screening and in relation to test results. In addition, the gynaecologists tended to differentiate morally through choice of language between women who participate in some form of screening and non-attendees of the PCCSP. There also appeared to be distinctions in how these gynaecologists conceptualised and discussed women receiving Pap-smears, dependent on whether they were regarded as within the category of ‘my patients’ (seen by the gynaecologist in a private or public setting) or ‘the population’ (women unknown to the gynaecologist). This study indicates the importance of comprehensively analysing the context of professionals’ work when attempting to understand professional attitudes. Seeming disparities in attitudes as well as varying practices may be explained by the simultaneous existence of multiple value systems, applied to different patient populations, as found in this study.