• Title of article

    Minimally Invasive Operation for Esophageal Diverticula

  • Author/Authors

    Hiran C. Fernando، نويسنده , , James D. Luketich، نويسنده , , John Samphire، نويسنده , , Miguel Alvelo-Rivera، نويسنده , , Neil A. Christie، نويسنده , , Percival O. Buenaventuraand، نويسنده , , Rodney J. Landreneau، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
  • Pages
    5
  • From page
    2076
  • To page
    2080
  • Abstract
    Background Mid and lower esophageal diverticula are rare entities usually managed by open operation. Morbidity can be significant with these complex procedures. This study evaluates our results of minimally invasive surgery for esophageal diverticula. Methods Over a 5-year period, 20 patients underwent operation for esophageal diverticula. Median age was 70.5 years. There were 16 epiphrenic and 4 midesophageal diverticula with a median size of 7.5 cm (range, 2-11 cm). Symptoms included dysphagia (14), regurgitation (12), weight loss (8), heartburn (4), aspiration pneumonia (3), chest pain (2), and vomiting (2). Dysphagia scores (1 = none, 5 = severe) were recorded before and after operation. Results Surgical approaches were laparoscopy (10), video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) (7), laparoscopic/VATS (2), and laparoscopic/thoracotomy (1). The most common operation performed was a diverticulectomy, myotomy, and partial fundoplication (12). Complications occurred in 9 (45%) patients and included 4 (20%) esophageal leaks. Three leak patients had successful outcomes; the fourth patient died 61 days after operation. Median hospital stay was 5.0 (1–61) days. Detailed follow-up was available in 18 patients at a median of 15 (1–70) months. Dysphagia scores improved significantly (p< 0.001) from 2.3 to 1.3 postoperatively. Symptomatic improvement was excellent in 13 (72%), good in 2 (11%), fair in 1 (6%), and poor in 2 (11%) patients. Conclusions Minimally invasive operations for esophageal diverticula are feasible but also challenging. The potential for morbidity is significant. Patients should be selected and evaluated carefully before undertaking repair. Open surgery should remain the standard except in centers experienced with minimally invasive esophageal surgery.
  • Journal title
    The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • Serial Year
    2005
  • Journal title
    The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • Record number

    609199