• Title of article

    Allograft Heart Valve Viability and Valve-Processing Variables

  • Author/Authors

    Kenneth L. Gall BApplSc، نويسنده , , Susan E. Smith BSc، نويسنده , , Christene A. Willmette EN، نويسنده , , Mark F. O’Brien FRACS، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1998
  • Pages
    7
  • From page
    1032
  • To page
    1038
  • Abstract
    Background. The impact of allograft valve viability on valve durability remains controversial. Analyses of our clinical results have demonstrated the superiority of the cryopreserved valve viable at the time of implantation over the 4°C stored valve nonviable at the time of implantation. In this study, we quantitatively assessed the effects on viability of current and past valve-processing protocols at The Prince Charles Hospital. Methods. The viability of pulmonary valves was quantitatively analyzed by thin-layer autoradiography to assess the effects of donor type, antibiotics, and valve storage. Results. Control valve segments obtained from beating-heart donor valves had a higher initial viability (0.92 ± 0.02) than nonbeating-heart donor valves (0.66 ± 0.03). Cryopreservation after low-dose antibiotic sterilization significantly reduced viability to 50% to 60% of the control, and in the presence of amphotericin B, viability dropped further to 10% to 36% of the control. After 7 days’ storage at 4°C, viability was reduced to 2% of control and to 0% viability after 21 days. Conclusions. For maximal preimplantation viability, valves should be procured as soon as possible after cessation of heart beat and should be cryopreserved if they are not to be clinically implanted within 1 to 2 days. Amphotericin B should not be used in conjunction with cryopreservation if viability is to be maximized.
  • Journal title
    The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • Serial Year
    1998
  • Journal title
    The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • Record number

    614978