Title of article
Should the Aortic Valve Homograft Be Recryopreserved?
Author/Authors
Akihiko Ohkado MD، نويسنده , , Mitsuhiro Hachida MD، نويسنده , , Hiroshi Furukawa MD، نويسنده , , Hua Lu MD، نويسنده , , Naoji Hanayama MD، نويسنده , , Hironobu Hoshi BS، نويسنده , , Hitoshi Koyanagi MD، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1998
Pages
4
From page
1083
To page
1086
Abstract
Background. The number of homograft donors is limited and the once-thawed homograft may be unsuitable for the recipient and obliged to be wasted. The purpose of this study was to investigate the possibility of recryopreserving and using the once-thawed homograft for another patient.
Methods. Canine aortic valve leaflets were frozen to −80°C by a programmed freezer, stored in liquid nitrogen, and thawed after 1 week. A subgroup of leaflets was left at 4°C for 15 minutes, re-cryopreserved, and thawed after 1 week. Pathologic and flow cytometric evaluations were performed.
Results. After thawing, by pathology, alignment of the fibers was acceptably maintained but the membrane and cytoplasm of the fibroblast were damaged. These findings were not significantly aggravated even after rethawing. By flow cytometry, fibroblast viability was 90.7% ± 1.7% immediately after thawing, 87.6% ± 1.0% after thawing for 15 minutes at 4°C, 63.7% ± 2.7% during refreezing at 0°C, and 39.4% ± 4.3% after rethawing.
Conclusions. From the standpoint of fibroblast viability, it is not possible to recryopreserve the once-cryopreserved and thawed aortic valve homograft.
Journal title
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Serial Year
1998
Journal title
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Record number
614987
Link To Document