• Title of article

    Bioprosthetic replacement after bioprosthesis failure: a hazardous choice?

  • Author/Authors

    Nicola Spampinato، نويسنده , , Cesare Gagliardi، نويسنده , , Donato Pantaleo MD، نويسنده , , Ludovico Fimiani، نويسنده , , Raimondo Ascione، نويسنده , , Fabio De Robertis، نويسنده , , Sebastiano Antonino Musumeci، نويسنده , , Paolo Stassano، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1998
  • Pages
    5
  • From page
    68
  • To page
    72
  • Abstract
    Background. Following bioprosthetic failure, replacement is usually done with mechanical valves to avoid repeated reoperations. Methods. From 1986 to 1996 we operated on 130 patients with bioprosthetic failure, implanting a new bioprosthesis; this group included patients with contraindication to anticoagulation, tricuspid replacement, and specific patient requests. Mean age was 63 ± 8 years. Results. The perioperative mortality was 13.8%. At 10 year follow-up the actuarial estimate of survival was 77.4% ± 6.6%. Freedom from structural valve deterioration was estimated at 81.8% ± 6.3%. Freedom from a third operation was estimated at 85.5% ± 5.2%. No patient was permanently anticoagulated. Freedom from thromboembolism was estimated at 91.5% ± 4%, and there were no hemorrhages. Freedom from cardiac-related deaths was estimated at 85.7% ± 5%. Conclusions. This group of patients received the first valve between 1976 and 1986; the range of the cumulative follow-up reaches 20 years, and the extended survival compares favorably with survival of mechanical valves.
  • Journal title
    The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • Serial Year
    1998
  • Journal title
    The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • Record number

    615512