Title of article
A comparison of surgery for neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome between laborers and nonlaborers
Author/Authors
Charles D. Goff، نويسنده , , F. Noel Parent، نويسنده , , Dean T. Sato، نويسنده , , Kevin D. Robinson، نويسنده , , Roger T. Gregory، نويسنده , , Robert G. Gayle، نويسنده , , Richard J. DeMasi، نويسنده , , George H. Meier، نويسنده , , James W. ReidJr.، نويسنده , , Jock R. Wheeler، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1998
Pages
4
From page
215
To page
218
Abstract
Objective: To determine factors of outcome following surgical intervention for neurologic thoracic outlet syndrome (NTOS).
Methods: In a retrospective study of patients surgically treated for NTOS, outcome was evaluated by postoperative symptoms and the ability of patients to return to work.
Results: Good, fair, and poor results were obtained in 26 (48%), 21 (39%), and 7 (13%) patients, respectively. The best predictor of a good outcome was occupation. Nonlaborers were more likely to have good outcome (21 of 32, 66%) when compared with laborers (5 of 22, 23%; P = 0.0025). Only 6 of 20 (30%) laborers were able to return to their original occupation compared with 17 of 26 (65%) nonlaborers (P = 0.036).
Conclusions: Laborers with NTOS are less likely to have a good result from surgical intervention, are unlikely to return to their original occupation, and may require retraining for a non-labor-intensive occupation if they cannot return to their original work.
Journal title
The American Journal of Surgery
Serial Year
1998
Journal title
The American Journal of Surgery
Record number
620377
Link To Document