Title of article
An institutional experience with laparoscopic gastric bypass complications seen in the first year compared with open gastric bypass complications during the same period
Author/Authors
Craig See، نويسنده , , Preston L. Carter، نويسنده , , David Elliott، نويسنده , , Philip Mullenix، نويسنده , , William Eggebroten، نويسنده , , Frank Clifford Porter، نويسنده , , David Watts، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2002
Pages
6
From page
533
To page
538
Abstract
Background: Complication rates for laparoscopic bariatric surgery remain in evolution.
Methods: Single institution review of the initial year’s experience with laparoscopic gastric bypass compared with open gastric bypass complications for the same period.
Results: There were 20 laparoscopic and 52 open gastric bypass procedures. Five laparoscopic patients had major complications. There were 4 anastomotic leaks. Nine open bypass patients had major complications, with 2 leaks. Leak rate was 20% for the laparoscopic group and 4% for the open group. All leaks in both groups led to substantial morbidity. There were two deaths, one in each group. The laparoscopic death was from postleak sepsis.
Conclusions: Gastric bypass, whether done open or laparoscopically, has significant surgical risk. Complication profiles differed between the two groups. Anastomotic leaks were significantly more frequent in the laparoscopic group, probably related to the learning curve. There is a continued need for open surgery in many bariatric patients.
Keywords
bariatric surgery , surgical complications , obesity , laparoscopic surgery
Journal title
The American Journal of Surgery
Serial Year
2002
Journal title
The American Journal of Surgery
Record number
621399
Link To Document