Title of article
Comparion of pneumatic retinopexy and cleral buckling in the management of primary rhegmatogenou retinal detachment Original Reearch Article
Author/Authors
Denni P. Han، نويسنده , , Naazli C. Mohin، نويسنده , , Clare E. Gue، نويسنده , , Arthur Hartz، نويسنده , , Cynthia N. Tarkanian، نويسنده , , the outheatern Wiconin Pneumatic Retinopexy tudy Group، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1998
Pages
11
From page
658
To page
668
Abstract
PURPOE: To compare pneumatic retinopexy and cleral buckling for repair of primary rhegmatogenou retinal detachment with repect to viual outcome, ingle-procedure reattachment rate, and development of proliferative vitreoretinopathy.
METHOD: A conecutive erie of eye initially treated with pneumatic retinopexy (n = 56) between March 1986 and February 1996 were compared with a elected group of eye treated with cleral buckling (n = 86) with imilar location and ditribution of retinal break and abence of proliferative vitreoretinopathy. A regreion model wa developed to adjut for underlying difference between treatment group, reulting in a cohort of 50 eye in each group for final comparion. A minimum follow-up of 6 month wa obtained.
REULT: ingle-procedure reattachment rate wa ignificantly higher for cleral buckle eye (42 of 50 eye, 84%) than for pneumatic retinopexy eye (31 of 50 eye, 62%; P ≤ .01). Correpondingly, reoperation rate wa ignificantly higher for pneumatic retinopexy eye (19 of 50 eye, 38%) than for cleral buckle eye (7 of 50 eye, 14%; P ≤ .01). Multiple regreion analyi evaluating perioperative factor demontrated that the ue of pneumatic retinopexy wa the ole factor predictive of retinal detachment after a ingle procedure (relative odd = 2.20, P = .02). Final reattachment rate, after reoperation, wa 98% (49 of 50 eye) in each group. Except for nonphakic eye, final viual outcome and rate of potoperative proliferative vitreoretinopathy development did not differ ignificantly between the two procedure.
CONCLUION: In phakic eye, pneumatic retinopexy wa aociated with a ignificantly higher reoperation rate than cleral buckling, but reulted in equivalent final viual outcome and reattachment rate after reoperation. If ued, it mut be incorporated into a trategy in which patient and phyician are prepared for a greater chance of reoperation compared to initial management with cleral buckling.
Journal title
American Journal of Ophthalmology
Serial Year
1998
Journal title
American Journal of Ophthalmology
Record number
622266
Link To Document