Title of article
Rik factor for failure of 5-fluorouracil needling reviion for failed conjunctival filtration bleb
Author/Authors
Dong H. hin، نويسنده , , Yong Y. Kim، نويسنده , , avita Y. Ginde، نويسنده , , Paul H. Kim، نويسنده , , Babak Eliai-Rad، نويسنده , , Anup K. Khatana، نويسنده , , Nandita . Keole، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2001
Pages
6
From page
875
To page
880
Abstract
PURPOE: To invetigate the rik factor for failure of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) needling reviion, a ueful procedure for retoring a failed filtration bleb.
DEIGN: Interventional cae erie.
METHOD: Retropectively conducted tudy.
ETTING: Intitutional.
TUDY POPULATION: ixty-four eye of 64 conecutive glaucoma patient that underwent 5-FU needling reviion for failed filtering bleb following either trabeculectomy or phaco-trabeculectomy with or without adjunctive mitomycin C (MMC).
OBERVATION PROCEDURE: Goldmann applanation tonometry, Kaplan-Meier urvival analyi, and Cox proportional hazard regreion analyi.
MAIN OUTCOME MEAURE: ucceful outcome of the initial 5-FU needling reviion, arbitrarily defined a target intraocular preure (IOP) control with not more than two topical glaucoma medication and no additional 5-FU needling or other urgical procedure, wa analyzed by Kaplan-Meier urvival analyi, and rik factor for failure of the initial 5-FU needling reviion were analyzed by Cox proportional hazard regreion analyi.
REULT: The cumulative ucce rate of the initial 5-FU needling reviion wa 45% at 1 year, 33% at 2 year, and 28% at 4 year. Failure of the initial 5-FU reviion correlated ignificantly with preneedling IOP > 30 mm Hg (P = .0003), lack of MMC ue during the previou filtration urgery (P = .013), and IOP >10 mm Hg immediately following needling reviion (P = .0012) according to Cox’ proportional hazard regreion analyi.
CONCLUION: Pre-needling IOP > 30 mm Hg, lack of MMC ue during the previou filtration urgery, and IOP > 10 mm Hg immediately after needling were found to be ignificant rik factor for failure of the initial 5-FU needling procedure. Therefore, it i important to monitor IOP cloely following needling reviion in thoe patient with uch rik factor. They are more likely to require additional therapeutic intervention, including repeat needling reviion.
Journal title
American Journal of Ophthalmology
Serial Year
2001
Journal title
American Journal of Ophthalmology
Record number
623547
Link To Document