• Title of article

    Effect of Incentives and Mailing Features on Online Health Program Enrollment Original Research Article

  • Author/Authors

    Gwen L. Alexander، نويسنده , , George W. Divine، نويسنده , , Mick P. Couper، نويسنده , , Jennifer B. McClure، نويسنده , , Melanie A. Stopponi، نويسنده , , Kristine K. Fortman، نويسنده , , Dennis D. Tolsma، نويسنده , , Victor J. Strecher، نويسنده , , Christine Cole Johnson، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2008
  • Pages
    7
  • From page
    382
  • To page
    388
  • Abstract
    Effect of Incentives and Mailing Features on Online Health Program Enrollment Original Research Article Pages 382-388 Gwen L. Alexander, George W. Divine, Mick P. Couper, Jennifer B. McClure, Melanie A. Stopponi, Kristine K. Fortman, Dennis D. Tolsma, Victor J. Strecher, Christine Cole Johnson Close Close preview | Purchase PDF (93 K) | Related articles | Related reference work articles AbstractAbstract | Figures/TablesFigures/Tables | ReferencesReferences Background With the growing use of Internet-based interventions, strategies are needed to encourage broader participation. This study examined the effects of combinations of monetary incentives and mailing characteristics on enrollment, retention, and cost effectiveness for an online health program. Methods In 2004, a recruitment letter was mailed to randomly selected Midwestern integrated health system members aged 21–65 and stratified by gender and race/ethnicity; recipients were randomly pre-assigned to one of 24 combinations of incentives and various mailing characteristics. Enrollment and 3-month retention rates were measured by completion of online surveys. Analysis, completed in 2005, compared enrollment and retention factors using t tests and chi-square tests. Multivariate logistic regression modeling assessed the probability of enrollment and retention. Results Of 12,289 subjects, 531 (4.3%) enrolled online, ranging from 1% to 11% by incentive combination. Highest enrollment occurred with unconditional incentives, and responses varied by gender. Retention rates ranged from 0% to 100%, with highest retention linked to higher-value incentives. The combination of a $2 bill prepaid incentive and the promise of $20 for retention (10% enrollment and 71% retention) was optimal, considering per-subject recruitment costs ($32 enrollment, $70 retention) and equivalent enrollment by gender and race/ethnicity. Conclusions Cash incentives improved enrollment in an online health program. Men and women responded differently to mailing characteristics and incentives. Including a small prepaid monetary incentive ($2 or $5) and revealing the higher promised-retention incentive was cost effective and boosted enrollment. Article Outline Introduction Methods and Materials Study Population Study Protocol Incentive Combinations Statistical Analysis Results Discussion Acknowledgements References
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Preventive Medicine
  • Serial Year
    2008
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Preventive Medicine
  • Record number

    638360