• Title of article

    Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: A prospective, randomized trial to evaluate benefits in early outcome, ,

  • Author/Authors

    Valerio Mais، نويسنده , , Silvia Ajossa، نويسنده , , Stefano Guerriero، نويسنده , , Monica Mascia، نويسنده , , Enrico Solla، نويسنده , , Gian Benedetto Melis، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1996
  • Pages
    5
  • From page
    654
  • To page
    658
  • Abstract
    OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to investigate the advantages of laparoscopic myomectomy versus laparotomy. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized trial was performed on 40 women, 22 to 44 years old, undergoing myomectomy. Patients were randomized to have laparoscopy (n = 20) or laparotomy (n = 20). The intensity of pain was assessed by a visual analog scale at 0, 1, 2, and 3 days postoperatively. The proportions of patients who were analgesic free on day 2, discharged from the hospital by day 3, and feeling fully recuperated on day 15 were also compared. RESULTS: The intensity of postoperative pain was lower (p< 0.05) after laparoscopy than after laparotomy. A higher (p< 0.05) proportion of patients was analgesic free on day 2, discharged from hospital by day 3, and feeling fully recuperated on day 15 after laparoscopy compared with laparotomy. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic myomectomy may offer the benefits of lower postoperative pain and shorter recovery time in comparison with laparotomy. (AM J OBSTET GYNECOL 1996;174:654-8.)
  • Keywords
    Myomectomy , laparoscopy , Laparotomy , pain , postoperative recovery
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Serial Year
    1996
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Record number

    639358