Title of article
Profet, profits, and proof: Do nausea and vomiting of early pregnancy protect women from “harmful” vegetables?
Author/Authors
Judith E. Brown، نويسنده , , Emily S. Kahn، نويسنده , , Terryl J. Hartman، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1997
Pages
3
From page
179
To page
181
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this research was to test a widely publicized theory that nausea and vomiting of pregnancy protects women from ingesting certain vegetables and other foods that produce congenital anomalies and other adverse outcomes of pregnancy.
Study Design: The theory was tested with use of data on dietary intake, illnesses, and pregnancy outcome obtained from 549 women participating in a prospective, population-based study.
Results: No relationship between intake of proscribed vegetables and other foods and the presence of nausea and vomiting in early pregnancy was identified. Intake of proscribed foods was unrelated to adverse outcomes of pregnancy.
Conclusion: It is suggested that claims made in the popular press about food and health relationships should be evaluated by the media as fiction unless supported by scientific research.
Keywords
Pregnancy , Nausea and vomiting , diet , congenital defects , pregnancy outcome
Journal title
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Serial Year
1997
Journal title
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Record number
640017
Link To Document