Title of article
Early transvaginal ultrasonography versus early cerclage in women with an unclear history of incompetent cervix
Author/Authors
Susan Kelly، نويسنده , , Marjorie Pollock، نويسنده , , Bridget Maas، نويسنده , , Cedrick LeFebvre، نويسنده , , James Manley، نويسنده , , Anthony Sciscione، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2001
Pages
3
From page
1097
To page
1099
Abstract
Objective: Our aim was to compare outcomes in women with a questionable history of incompetent cervix, followed up with early transvaginal ultrasonography, with outcomes in women who had early cerclage. Study Design: Charts were reviewed and patients identified for incompetent cervix from our obstetric database from 1995 through 1997. We included women who had an unclear history of incompetent cervix as follows: second-trimester loss or termination, ≥3 first-trimester terminations, cone biopsy or loop electrosurgical excision, or exposure to diethylstilbestrol. The primary outcome variable was gestational age at delivery. Results: A total of 106 women were included, 45 in the early cerclage group and 61 in the early transvaginal ultrasonography group. The mean gestational age at delivery was 35.1 weeks for the early cerclage group versus 36.1 weeks for the early transvaginal ultrasonography group. Conclusion: In women with an unclear history of incompetent cervix, early cerclage does not appear to offer significant benefit over early transvaginal ultrasonography. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184:1097-9.)
Keywords
Incompetent cervix , transvaginal , ultrasonography
Journal title
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Serial Year
2001
Journal title
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Record number
641345
Link To Document