• Title of article

    Delivery strategies for women with a previous classic cesarean delivery: A decision analysis

  • Author/Authors

    Naomi E. Stotland، نويسنده , , Lisa S. Lipschitz، نويسنده , , Aaron B. Caughey، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2002
  • Pages
    6
  • From page
    1203
  • To page
    1208
  • Abstract
    Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare four strategies for treating patients with a previous classic cesarean delivery by medical outcomes and quality-adjusted life years. Study Design: A decision tree was designed that compared four strategies for a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 women with a previous classic cesarean delivery: (1) delivery at 39 weeks of gestation, (2) delivery at 36 weeks of gestation without amniocentesis, (3) amniocentesis at 36 weeks of gestation with delivery if the fetus was mature and antenatal corticosteroids if the fetus was immature, and (4) weekly amniocentesis starting at 36 weeks of gestation with delivery when mature. Results: Strategy 2 provided the greatest maternal quality-adjusted life years. Comparing strategy 1 with strategy 2, it was determined that 27 cesarean deliveries must be performed at 36 weeks of gestation with one associated case of respiratory distress syndrome to prevent one case of uterine rupture. Sensitivity analysis revealed that the uterine rupture rate must be below 0.36% for any strategy to surpass strategy 2 (elective cesarean delivery at 36 weeks of gestation without amniocentesis). Conclusion: A 36-week delivery may be preferable because it provides a lower risk of severe adverse outcomes and higher maternal quality of life. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:1203-8.)
  • Keywords
    Classic cesarean delivery , decision analysis , uterine rupture
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Serial Year
    2002
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Record number

    642115