• Title of article

    Planned cesarean hysterectomy: A preferred alternative to separate operations, ,

  • Author/Authors

    D.Paul Seago، نويسنده , , William E. Roberts، نويسنده , , Vanessa K. Johnson، نويسنده , , Rick W. Martin، نويسنده , , John C. Morrison، نويسنده , , James N. Martin Jr، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1999
  • Pages
    9
  • From page
    1385
  • To page
    1393
  • Abstract
    Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate our institutional experience with planned cesarean hysterectomy. Study Design: In this retrospective case-control investigation of a 16-year experience, 100 pregnant women who underwent planned cesarean hysterectomy were compared with 37 patients who underwent cesarean delivery followed by a hysterectomy performed within 6 months. Results: Women undergoing planned cesarean hysterectomy did not have any demonstrable increase in intraoperative or postoperative complications when compared with the cesarean delivery plus later hysterectomy group. Primarily as a result of significantly reduced hospital stay and shorter total operative time, there was a significant financial advantage associated with a single planned cesarean hysterectomy with respect to separate operations. Conclusions: A policy to undertake planned cesarean hysterectomy for carefully selected patients appeared to produce advantages without increasing risks for these patients. Secondarily, it provided resident physicians the opportunity to learn the operation with supervision and under controlled circumstances. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:1385-93.)
  • Keywords
    Cesarean delivery , operative complications , scheduled cesarean hysterectomy
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Serial Year
    1999
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Record number

    643311