Title of article
Outcome of uterine embolization and hysterectomy for leiomyomas: Results of a multicenter study
Author/Authors
James B Spies، نويسنده , , Jay M Cooper، نويسنده , , Robert Worthington-Kirsch، نويسنده , , John C Lipman، نويسنده , , Benjie B. Mills، نويسنده , , James F Benenati، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
Pages
10
From page
22
To page
31
Abstract
Objective
The purpose of this study was to estimate the outcomes of uterine embolization and hysterectomy for uterine leiomyomas.
Study design
This was a multicenter prospective study of patients who were treated with embolization (n = 102 patients) and hysterectomy (n = 50 patients) for leiomyomas. Changes in symptoms, complications, and quality of life were measured. The data analysis included linear and logistic regression, the Student t and paired t test, Fisherʹs exact test, and chi-squared test.
Results
For patients who underwent embolization, there were marked reductions in blood loss scores (P< .001) and menorrhagia questionnaire scores (P< .001) compared with baseline. At 12 months, a larger proportion of the patients who had undergone hysterectomy experienced improved pelvic pain (P = .021). Both groups had marked improvement in other symptoms and quality of life scores, with no difference between groups. Complications were more frequent in patients who underwent hysterectomy (50% vs 27.5%; P = .01).
Conclusion
Both procedures substantially improved symptoms for most patients, with an advantage for hysterectomy at 12 months for pelvic pain. Serious complications were infrequent in both groups.
Keywords
LeiomyomaEmbolizationHysterectomyQuality of life
Journal title
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Serial Year
2004
Journal title
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Record number
644138
Link To Document