• Title of article

    Vaginal versus ultrasound examination of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor

  • Author/Authors

    Margaret R. Chou، نويسنده , , Doron Kreiser، نويسنده , , M.Mark Taslimi، نويسنده , , Maurice L. Druzin، نويسنده , , Yasser Y. El-Sayed، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
  • Pages
    4
  • From page
    521
  • To page
    524
  • Abstract
    Objective The purpose of this study was to determine whether ultrasonography is more accurate than vaginal examination in the determination of fetal occiput position in the second stage of labor. Study design Eighty-eight patients in the second stage of labor were evaluated by vaginal examination and by combined transabdominal and transperineal ultrasound examination to determine occiput position. These predictions of position were compared with the actual delivery position at vaginal delivery after spontaneous restitution or at cesarean delivery. Different examiners performed the vaginal examinations and the ultrasound examinations. Each examiner was blinded to the determination of the other examiner. Results Vaginal examination determined fetal occiput position correctly 71.6% of the time; ultrasound examination determined fetal occiput position correctly 92.0% of the time (P = .018). Conclusion Ultrasound examination is more accurate than vaginal examination in the diagnosis of fetal occiput position in the second stage of labor.
  • Keywords
    Fetal occiput positionOcciput posteriorUltrasound examinationSecond stage of labor
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Serial Year
    2004
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Record number

    644223