Title of article
Comparison of maternal mortality and morbidity between trial of labor and elective cesarean section among women with previous cesarean delivery
Author/Authors
Shi Wu Wen، نويسنده , , I.D. Rusen، نويسنده , , Mark Walker، نويسنده , , Robert Liston، نويسنده , , Michael S. Kramer، نويسنده , , Tom Baskett، نويسنده , , Maureen Heaman، نويسنده , , Shiliang Liu، نويسنده , , For the Maternal Health Study Group of the Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System.، نويسنده , , Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2004
Pages
7
From page
1263
To page
1269
Abstract
Objective
This study was undertaken to assess the safety of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery.
Study design
Retrospective cohort study of 308,755 Canadian women with previous cesarean delivery between 1988 and 2000. Occurrences of in-hospital maternal death, uterine rupture, and other severe maternal morbidity were compared between women with a trial of labor and those with an elective cesarean section.
Results
Rates of uterine rupture (0.65%), transfusion (0.19%), and hysterectomy (0.10%) were significantly higher in the trial-of-labor group. Maternal in-hospital death rate, however, was lower in the trial-of-labor group (1.6 per 100,000) than in the elective cesarean section group (5.6 per 100,000). The association between trial of labor and uterine rupture was stronger in low volume (<500) than in high volume (≥500 births per year) obstetric units.
Conclusion
Trial of labor is associated with increased risk of uterine rupture, but elective cesarean section may increase the risk of maternal death.
Keywords
Trial of laborVaginal birth aftercesarean sectionElective cesarean deliveryMaternal mortalityUterine ruptureHysterectomyObstetric volum
Journal title
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Serial Year
2004
Journal title
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Record number
644356
Link To Document