Title of article
The impact of occiput posterior fetal head position on the risk of anal sphincter injury in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries
Author/Authors
Lorena Benavides، نويسنده , , Jennifer M. Wu، نويسنده , , Andrew F. Hundley، نويسنده , , Thomas S. Ivester، نويسنده , , Anthony G. Visco، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Pages
5
From page
1702
To page
1706
Abstract
Objective
A forceps-assisted vaginal delivery is a well-recognized risk factor for anal sphincter injury. Some studies have shown that occiput posterior (OP) fetal head position is also associated with an increased risk for third- or fourth-degree lacerations. The objective of this study was to assess whether OP position confers an incrementally increased risk for anal sphincter injury above that present with forceps deliveries.
Study design
This was a retrospective cohort study of 588 singleton, cephalic, forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries performed at our institution between January 1996 and October 2003. Maternal demographics, labor and delivery characteristics, and neonatal factors were examined. Statistical analysis consisted of univariate statistics, Student t test, χ2, and logistic regression.
Results
The prevalence of occiput anterior (OA) and OP positions was 88.4% and 11.6%, respectively. The groups were similar in age, marital status, body mass index, use of epidural, frequency of inductions, episiotomies, and shoulder dystocias. The OA group had a higher frequency of rotational forceps (16.2% vs 5.9%, P = .03), greater birth weights (3304 ± 526 g vs 3092 ± 777 g, P = .004), and a larger percentage of white women (48.8% vs 34.3%, P = .04). Overall, 35% of forceps deliveries resulted in a third- or fourth-degree laceration. Anal sphincter injury occurred significantly more often in the OP group compared with the OA group (51.5% vs 32.9%, P = .003), giving an odds ratio of 2.2 (CI: 1.3-3.6). In a logistic regression model that controlled for occiput posterior position, maternal body mass index, race, length of second stage, episiotomy, birth weight, and rotational forceps, OP head position was 3.1 (CI: 1.6-6.2) times more likely to be associated with anal sphincter injury than OA head position.
Conclusion
Forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries have been associated with a greater risk for anal sphincter injury. Within this population of forceps deliveries, an OP position further increases the risk of third- or fourth-degree lacerations when compared with an OA position.
Keywords
Operative vaginaldeliveryForceps-assistedvaginal deliveryOcciput posteriorpositionAnal sphincter injuryAnal incontinence
Journal title
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Serial Year
2005
Journal title
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Record number
644826
Link To Document