Title of article
Laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexies: A comparative cohort study
Author/Authors
Marie Fidela R. Paraiso، نويسنده , , Mark D. Walters، نويسنده , , Raymond R. Rackley، نويسنده , , Seham Melek، نويسنده , , Cathy Hugney، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2005
Pages
7
From page
1752
To page
1758
Abstract
Objective
This study was undertaken to compare laparoscopic and open sacral colpopexies for efficacy and safety.
Study design
Charts were reviewed for 56 patients who underwent laparoscopic sacral colpopexy and 61 patients who underwent open sacral colpopexy. Demographic and hospital data, complications, and follow-up visits were reviewed.
Results
Mean follow-up was 13.5 ± 12.1 months and 15.7 ± 18.1months in the laparoscopic and open groups, respectively. Mean operating time was significantly greater in the laparoscopic versus open cohort, 269 ± 65 minutes and 218 ± 60 minutes, respectively (P< .0001). Estimated blood loss (172 ± 166 mL vs 234 ± 149 mL; P = .04) and hospital stay (1.8 ± 1.0 days vs 4.0 ± 1.8 days; P< .0001) were significantly less in the laparoscopic group than the open group. Complication and reoperation rates were similar.
Conclusion
Laparoscopic and open sacral colpopexies have comparable clinical outcomes. Although laparoscopic sacral colpopexy requires longer operating time, hospital stay is significantly decreased.
Keywords
Laparoscopicabdominal sacralcolpopexyVaginal apex prolapseVaginal vaultsuspension
Journal title
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Serial Year
2005
Journal title
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Record number
644834
Link To Document