• Title of article

    The incidence of ureteral obstruction and the value of intraoperative cystoscopy during vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse

  • Author/Authors

    A. Marcus Gustilo-Ashby، نويسنده , , J. Eric Jelovsek، نويسنده , , Matthew D. Barber، نويسنده , , Eun-Hee Yoo، نويسنده , , Marie Fidela R. Paraiso، نويسنده , , Mark D. Walters، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
  • Pages
    8
  • From page
    1478
  • To page
    1485
  • Abstract
    Objective The objective of the study was to determine the incidence of ureteral obstruction during vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and the accuracy and efficacy of intraoperative cystoscopy. Study design The study was a retrospective review of 700 consecutive patients who underwent vaginal surgery for anterior and/or apical pelvic organ prolapse with universal intraoperative cystoscopy. Results Thirty-seven patients (5.3%) had no spillage of dye from 1 or both ureters intraoperatively. The false-positive and negative cystoscopy rates were 0.4% and 0.3%, respectively. Thus, the true incidence of intraoperative ureteral obstruction was 5.1%. Intraoperative cystoscopy was accurate in 99.3% of cases, with a sensitivity and specificity of 94.4% and 99.5%, respectively. Suture removal relieved ureteral obstruction in 88% of cases. Six subjects (0.9%) had true ureteral injuries. Conclusion Vaginal surgery for anterior and/or apical pelvic organ prolapse is associated with an intraoperative ureteral obstruction rate of 5.1%. Intraoperative cystoscopy accurately detects ureteral obstruction and allows for relief of obstruction in the majority of cases.
  • Keywords
    Ureteral injuryUreteral obstructionProlapseCystoscopy
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Serial Year
    2006
  • Journal title
    American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Record number

    645468