• Title of article

    Peer review practicalities in clinical medicine

  • Author/Authors

    Matthew S. Metcalfe، نويسنده , , MAL Farrant، نويسنده , , JM Farrant، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2010
  • Pages
    4
  • From page
    49
  • To page
    52
  • Abstract
    Peer review processes in teaching requires a reviewer to observe a teacher’s prac -tice in a planned manner. Conversation between the two enables the teacher to reflect on their own teaching, promoting self-improvement. Although a central part of the teaching process, and despite its crucial role in continuing professional development, peer review is not widely practiced in hospital settings. This article explains the process and its benefits. Practical imple-mentations of the process in busy clinical settings are suggested. Its evaluation and incorporation into undergraduate learning and postgraduate clinical practice are described. With enthusiastic support for colleagues and allowances for its implementation, it should become part of the regular teaching practice, improving the quality of teaching delivered
  • Keywords
    Peer review , TEACHING , education , Clinical practice
  • Journal title
    Advances in Medical Education and Practice
  • Serial Year
    2010
  • Journal title
    Advances in Medical Education and Practice
  • Record number

    658661