• Title of article

    Scholasticism in Political Science

  • Author/Authors

    Lawrence M. Mead، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2010
  • Pages
    12
  • From page
    453
  • To page
    464
  • Abstract
    Criticism of trends in political science centers on specific methodologies—quantitative methods or rational choice. However, the more worrisome development is scholasticism—a tendency for research to become overspecialized and ingrown. I define that trend more closely and document its growth through increases in numbers of journals, organized sections in the American Political Science Association, and divisions within the APSA conference. I also code articles published in the American Political Science Review to show a growth in scholastic features in recent decades. The changes affect all fields in political science. Scholasticism serves values of rigor. To restrain it will require reemphasizing relevance to real-world issues and audiences. To do this should also help restore morale among political scientists.
  • Journal title
    Perspectives on Politics
  • Serial Year
    2010
  • Journal title
    Perspectives on Politics
  • Record number

    665272