Title of article
DIATHERMY TONSILLECTOMY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL DISSECTION TONSILLECTOMY
Author/Authors
Mohammad Sharif، نويسنده , , Javed Zaman، نويسنده , , Naveed Yousaf and Kamran Iqbal، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
فصلنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2001
Pages
7
From page
84
To page
90
Abstract
This study compares the conventional method of tonsillectomy, the dissection snare method with that of the newer procedure, bipolar electrodissection method. We studied 200 cases in two groups, hundred in each. In the first group the patients underwent tonsillectomy by dissection-snare method and in the second by electrodissection method. The results of the two groups were studied regarding the time taken in the procedure, blood loss during the procedure, postoperative analgesia required, reactionary hemorrhage, postoperative diet toleration and secondary hemorrhage. Regarding the postoperative diet taken and reactionary haemorrhage the bipolar method is better, but there is no significant difference regarding the postoperative analgesia, postoperative pain and secondary hemorrhage. We concluded that bipolar electrodissection method is the superior method regarding the time taken during the procedure, the intra operative blood loss was lower and there was no need of ties (ligating the bleeding vessels) in the diathermy method.
Journal title
Journal of Postgraduate Medical Institute (JPMI)
Serial Year
2001
Journal title
Journal of Postgraduate Medical Institute (JPMI)
Record number
684221
Link To Document