• Title of article

    Comparison of supercritical fluid extraction and Soxhlet extraction for the determination of aliphatic hydrocarbons in seaweed samples

  • Author/Authors

    M.O. Pun?n Crespo، نويسنده , , M.A. Lage Yusty، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2006
  • Pages
    6
  • From page
    400
  • To page
    405
  • Abstract
    Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) and Soxhlet extraction methods were compared in a study of the aliphatic hydrocarbon profiles of seaweed samples. Method precision for Soxhlet extraction ( 7.58%) was slightly better than that for SFE ( 9.28%) except for C28. The SFE method is a good alternative for the routine determination of alkanes in seaweed samples; however, for a complete study of shorter-chain n-alkanes, the Soxhlet extraction is a more suitable method. To evaluate the SFE and Soxhlet methods developed, three diverse Undaria pinnatifida samples collected at different dates and areas of the Galician coast were analyzed. n-Alkanes C18, C20, C22, C24, and C28 were found in all samples, with values lower than 7.9 μg g−1 d.w. The total hydrocarbon content was within the range of 13.6–21.7 μg g−1 d.w. C18 was found to be the most abundant.
  • Keywords
    Aliphatic hydrocarbons , Supercritical fluid extraction , Seaweed , Gas chromatography–flame ionization detector , Soxhlet extraction
  • Journal title
    Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
  • Serial Year
    2006
  • Journal title
    Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
  • Record number

    711099