• Title of article

    A Portable X-Ray Fluorescence Instrument for Analyzing Dust Wipe Samples for Lead: Evaluation with Field Samples

  • Author/Authors

    David A. Sterling، نويسنده , , Roger D. Lewis، نويسنده , , Douglas A. Luke، نويسنده , , Brooke N. Shadel، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2000
  • Pages
    6
  • From page
    174
  • To page
    179
  • Abstract
    Dust wipe samples collected in the field were tested by nondestructive X-ray fluorescence (XRF) followed by laboratory analysis with flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry (FAAS). Data were analyzed for precision and accuracy of measurement. Replicate samples with the XRF show high precision with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.97 (P<0.0001) and an overall coefficient of variation of 11.6%. Paired comparison indicates no statistical difference (P=0.272) between XRF and FAAS analysis. Paired samples are highly correlated with an R2 ranging between 0.89 for samples that contain paint chips and 0.93 for samples that do not contain paint chips. The ICC for absolute agreement between XRF and laboratory results was 0.95 (P<0.0001). The relative error over the concentration range of 25 to 14,200 μg Pb is −12% (95% CI, −18 to −5). The XRF appears to be an excellent method for rapid on-site evaluation of dust wipes for clearance and risk assessment purposes, although there are indications of some confounding when paint chips are present.
  • Keywords
    laboratoryanalysis , House dust , wipe sampling , Lead , Aeld sampling and analysis.
  • Journal title
    Environmental Research
  • Serial Year
    2000
  • Journal title
    Environmental Research
  • Record number

    727722