• Title of article

    The effect of different electrostatic potentials on docking accuracy: A case study using DOCK5.4

  • Author/Authors

    Keng-Chang Tsai، نويسنده , , Sheng-Hung Wang، نويسنده , , Nai-Wan Hsiao، نويسنده , , Minyong Li، نويسنده , , Binghe Wang، نويسنده ,

  • Issue Information
    روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2008
  • Pages
    4
  • From page
    3509
  • To page
    3512
  • Abstract
    As a commonly used structure-based approach for virtual screening, molecular design and lead optimization, molecular docking can search the preferred orientation and conformation of a ligand for its optimal binding to a receptor or enzyme active site. In doing so, selecting an appropriate method to calculate the electrostatic potentials is critical. In the current report, nine different semi-empirical and empirical methods, including AM1, AM1-BCC, Del-Re, MMFF, Gasteiger, Hückel, Gasteiger–Hückel, Pullman and formal charges were investigated for their performance on the prediction of docking poses using the DOCK5.4 program. The results demonstrated that the AM1-BCC charges had the highest success rate.
  • Keywords
    molecular docking , DOCK , Electrostatic potentials , Scoring function , AM1-BCC
  • Journal title
    Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters
  • Serial Year
    2008
  • Journal title
    Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters
  • Record number

    799587