Title of article
How well does standard clinician evaluation identify low likelihood of ischaemic or coronary heart disease?
Author/Authors
Poul F. H?ilund-Carlsen، نويسنده , , Allan Johansen، نويسنده , , Werner Vach، نويسنده , , Henrik Wulff Christensen، نويسنده , , Mette M?ldrup، نويسنده , , Torben Haghfelt، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 2008
Pages
3
From page
177
To page
179
Abstract
Guidelines claim that patients with a low likelihood of coronary artery disease can be reliably identified clinically by a simple set of rules. Among 385 patients referred for coronary angiography because of suspected stable angina pectoris we found by myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in three selected low likelihood groups reversible perfusion defects in 23%–29% of male and 11%–17% of female patients. Rates of significant angiographic disease were similar. These data question the validity of current clinical practice for identifying low likelihood of disease in this category of patients.
Keywords
Clinical evaluation , stable angina pectoris , Low likelihood of coronary artery disease , myocardial perfusion scintigraphy
Journal title
International Journal of Cardiology
Serial Year
2008
Journal title
International Journal of Cardiology
Record number
815593
Link To Document