Title of article
Guidelines for ecological compensation associated with highways Original Research Article
Author/Authors
Ruud Cuperus، نويسنده , , Kees J. Canters، نويسنده , , Helias A. Udo de Haes، نويسنده , , Debra S. Friedman، نويسنده ,
Issue Information
روزنامه با شماره پیاپی سال 1999
Pages
11
From page
41
To page
51
Abstract
Avoidance, mitigation and compensation are three planning concepts designed to counteract the adverse impacts of infrastructure on nature. To promote the compensation principle introduced in the Netherlands, this article proposes guidelines for its implementation in the context of highway development. To this end, a coherent framework has been developed comprising: (1) impacts on nature, (2) concepts for use in planning ecological compensation, and (3) ecological, spatial-planning and financial instruments for realizing such compensation. Finally, the Dutch experience is discussed within the international context. Recommendations are made for improving the implementation of compensation. These stress the importance of creating ‘win–win’ situations to increase public support, of dealing with impacts that cannot be predicted, and of developing criteria for evaluating compensation plans. There are still several priority problems to be dealt with: the effects of habitat isolation caused by highway projects, the effectiveness of compensation measures and compensation ratios (viz. ratios of replacement to lost area) greater than one, the real costs associated with replacing habitats, the feasibility of compensation for ecological values that are difficult to replace, and the strategy to exchange impacted and substitute habitats.
Keywords
Policy , Planning , Realization , Legislation , instruments , Costs
Journal title
Biological Conservation
Serial Year
1999
Journal title
Biological Conservation
Record number
835780
Link To Document