اﻟﻤﺴﺎءﻟﺔ اﻟﻨﻘدﯿﺔ ﻟﻘﯿﻤﺔ اﻟﺘراث اﻟﻌرﺒﻲ ﻋﻨد زﻛﻲ ﻨﺠﯿب ﻤﺤﻤود

vThis research represents a try to show the direct and indirect reasons which made the contemporary Arab thinker Zaki Najeeb Mahmoud to change his opinion from the adoption of a frank speech about refusing Arab heritage and following the developed science of the west instead, to adoption of a confused speech about accepting what he had called the reasonable part of heritage, and trying to merge it with members of west civilization, in order to be Arab and contemporary Arab at the same time, by trying to introduce a clarification show which criticize the nature of these two opinions, that both represented a different phase in Mahmoud 's thinking scheme