Author/Authors
Bicakci, Unal Ondokuz Mayis University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Pediatric Surgery, Division of Pediatric Urology, Turkey , Demirel, Dilek Maternity and Childrens Hospital, Turkey , Yagiz, Beytullah Ondokuz Mayis University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Pediatric Surgery, Division of Pediatric Urology, Turkey , Issi, Yasar Ondokuz Mayis University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Pediatric Surgery, Division of Pediatric Urology, Turkey , Gunaydin, Mithat Ondokuz Mayis University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Pediatric Surgery, Division of Pediatric Urology, Turkey , Tander, Burak Ondokuz Mayis University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Pediatric Surgery, Division of Pediatric Urology, Turkey , Bernay, Ferit Ondokuz Mayis University - Faculty of Medicine - Department of Pediatric Surgery, Division of Pediatric Urology, Turkey
Title Of Article
Comparison of treatment modalities for urinary tract dilatation in children: Open versus endoscopic surgery
شماره ركورد
38234
Abstract
Our aim is to evaluate the efficiency and outcomes of endoscopic surgery (ES) and open surgery (OS) in children with urinary tract dilatation (UTD). Between February 2009 and June 2014, 77 patients (41 male, 36 female) with UTD underwent either an OS or ES. The age, gender, final diagnosis, type of surgery, postoperative problems (hematuria, fever, urinary tract infection and length of hospital stay (LOS) are retrospectively evaluated. The ES for UTD causes less pain, less hematuria, decreased LOS after surgery. ES is superior in terms of postoperative pain management, morbidity and LOS in selected conditions.
From Page
23
NaturalLanguageKeyword
Children , Complications , Endoscopic treatment , Open treatment , Urinary tract dilatation
JournalTitle
Journal Of Experimental and Clinical Medicine
To Page
26
JournalTitle
Journal Of Experimental and Clinical Medicine
Link To Document