• Author/Authors

    EREN, Esin Ministry of Health - Antalya Public Health Center, Turkey , ELLIDAĞ, Hamit Yaşar Ministry of Health - Antalya Training and Research Hospital - Central Laboratories, Turkey , AYDIN, Özgür Ministry of Health - Antalya Training and Research Hospital - Central Laboratories, Turkey , AKYOL, Mahmut Akdeniz University - Medical Faculty - Department of Biology Genetics, Turkey , YILMAZ, Necat Ministry of Health - Antalya Training and Research Hospital - Clinical Biochemistry Central Laboratory, Turkey

  • Title Of Article

    Determining The Influence of Regional Differences and Maternal Factors on The Triple Test

  • شماره ركورد
    42143
  • Abstract
    Objective: Second-trimester maternal serum screening has become a routine part of prenatal care. We aimed to identify if triple test measurements were affected by regional differences and maternal factors. We compared our results with the results of a previous study on Turkish population, and with the values of the manufacturer firm. Material and Methods: The study group consisted of 984 pregnant women between 14–22 weeks of gestation who had undergone a triple test. The original PRISCA software was used for calculating the statistical risk. Results: Comparison of median values for serum AFP, between published Turkish population, manufacturer values and Gaziantep population were: 1% between Gaziantep population and Turkish population, and 3 % between Gaziantep population and manufacturer values in 16. gestational week; 5 % and 4 % in 17. gestational week; 13 % and 14 % in 18. gestational week, respectively. 19. gestational week showed no difference. Same comparison for β-hCG showed; 5 % and 1 % in 16. gestational week; 4 % and 2 % in 17. gestational week; 13 % and 1 % in 18. gestational week; 1 % and 24 % in 19. gestational week, respectively. Comparison for uE3 values showed; 36 % and 95 % in 16. gestational week; 39 % and 89 % in 17. gestational week; 25 % and 67 % in 18. gestational week; 34 % and 72 % in 19. gestational week, respectively. Conclusion: This study showed that, screening tests may vary based on regional differences. Our study presents a potential risk factor that may be an explanation for some problems with the triple test evaluations in some laboratories.
  • From Page
    124
  • NaturalLanguageKeyword
    Triple test , risk factors , regional differences , PRISCA
  • JournalTitle
    Kocatepe Medical Journal
  • To Page
    130
  • JournalTitle
    Kocatepe Medical Journal