• DocumentCode
    1107598
  • Title

    A bridged diagnostic method for the monitoring of polymorphic discrete-event systems

  • Author

    Lamperti, Gianfranco ; Zanella, Marina

  • Author_Institution
    Dipt. di Elettronica per l´´Automazione, Univ. degli Studi di Brescia, Italy
  • Volume
    34
  • Issue
    5
  • fYear
    2004
  • Firstpage
    2222
  • Lastpage
    2244
  • Abstract
    Diagnosis of discrete-event systems (DESs) is a challenging problem that has been tackled both by automatic control and artificial intelligence communities. The relevant approaches share similarities, including modeling by automata, compositional modeling, and model-based reasoning. This paper aims to bridge two complementary approaches from these communities, namely, the diagnoser approach and the active system approach, respectively. The more significant shortcomings of such approaches are, on the one side, the need for the generation of the global system model and, on the other, the lack of monitoring capabilities. The former makes the application of the diagnoser approach prohibitive in real contexts, where the system model is too large to be generated, even offline. The latter requires the completion of the system observation before starting the diagnostic task, thereby, making the monitoring of the system. impossible. The bridged diagnostic method subsumes, to a large extent on the peculiarities of the two approaches and is capable of coping with an extended class of DESs that integrate both synchronous and asynchronous behavior. The bridge is built by extending the active system approach by means of several enhanced techniques, which eventually, allow the efficient monitoring of polymorphic DESs. Upon the occurrence of each system message, two pieces of diagnostic information are generated, namely, the snapshot and historic diagnostic sets. While the former accounts for the faults pertinent to the newly generated message only, the latter is based on the whole sequence of messages yielded by the system during operation.
  • Keywords
    artificial intelligence; discrete event systems; fault diagnosis; system monitoring; active system approach; artificial intelligence; automatic control; bridged diagnostic method; diagnoser approach; fault detection; fault isolation; global system model; model-based reasoning; polymorphic discrete-event system; system message; Artificial intelligence; Automata; Automatic control; Bridges; Circuit faults; Communities; Computerized monitoring; Context modeling; Discrete event systems; Inference mechanisms; Algorithms; Artificial Intelligence; Computer Simulation; Decision Support Techniques; Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted; Equipment Failure Analysis; Interdisciplinary Communication; Models, Biological; Research; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; Systems Integration;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    1083-4419
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TSMCB.2004.835008
  • Filename
    1335517