• DocumentCode
    1124958
  • Title

    Integrated surface model optimization for freehand three-dimensional echocardiography

  • Author

    Song, Mingzhou ; Haralick, Robert M. ; Sheehan, Florence H. ; Johnson, Richard K.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Comput. Sci., City Univ. of New York, NY, USA
  • Volume
    21
  • Issue
    9
  • fYear
    2002
  • Firstpage
    1077
  • Lastpage
    1090
  • Abstract
    The major obstacle of three-dimensional (3-D) echocardiography is that the ultrasound image quality is too low to reliably detect features locally. Almost all available surface-finding algorithms depend on decent quality boundaries to get satisfactory surface models. We formulate the surface model optimization problem in a Bayesian framework, such that the inference made about a surface model is based on the integration of both the low-level image evidence and the high-level prior shape knowledge through a pixel class prediction mechanism. We model the probability of pixel classes instead of making explicit decisions about them. Therefore, we avoid the unreliable edge detection or image segmentation problem and the pixel correspondence problem. An optimal surface model best explains the observed images such that the posterior probability of the surface model for the observed images is maximized. The pixel feature vector as the image evidence includes several parameters such as the smoothed grayscale value and the minimal second directional derivative. Statistically, we describe the feature vector by the pixel appearance probability model obtained by a nonparametric optimal quantization technique. Qualitatively, we display the imaging plane intersections of the optimized surface models together with those of the ground-truth surfaces reconstructed from manual delineations. Quantitatively, we measure the projection distance error between the optimized and the ground-truth surfaces. In our experiment, we use 20 studies to obtain the probability models offline. The prior shape knowledge is represented by a catalog of 86 left ventricle surface models. In another set of 25 test studies, the average epicardial and endocardial surface projection distance errors are 3.2 ± 0.85 mm and 2.6 ± 0.78 mm, respectively.
  • Keywords
    Bayes methods; echocardiography; edge detection; medical image processing; optimisation; probability; vectors; decent quality boundaries; endocardial surface projection distance errors; freehand three-dimensional echocardiography; ground-truth surfaces; high-level prior shape knowledge; image segmentation problem; integrated surface model optimization; low-level image evidence; medical diagnostic imaging; pixel appearance probability model; pixel class prediction mechanism; pixel correspondence problem; pixel feature vector; projection distance error; satisfactory surface models; smoothed grayscale value; surface-finding algorithms; ultrasound image quality; unreliable edge detection; Computer vision; Echocardiography; Image quality; Inference algorithms; Pixel; Predictive models; Probability; Shape; Surface reconstruction; Ultrasonic imaging; Algorithms; Bayes Theorem; Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Probability; Ventricular Function, Left;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0278-0062
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TMI.2002.804433
  • Filename
    1166637