DocumentCode
1237900
Title
Comments, with reply, on "Electric field sensors in electromagnetic sounding" by Wu Xiao Wu and David V. Thiel
Author
Wait, James R.
Author_Institution
Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Arizona Univ., Tucson, AZ, USA
Volume
27
Issue
6
fYear
1989
Firstpage
789
Lastpage
792
Abstract
The conclusion by W.X. Wu and D.V. Thiel (see ibid., vol.27, p.24-27, Jan. 1989) that a horizontal, insulated, ungrounded antenna is a dependable probe for the horizontal E fields is questioned. It is shown that the horizontal insulated antenna should be grounded at the end points to provide a reliable measurement of the actual surface impedance in conjunction with the measurement of the horizontal magnetic field. Wu and Thiel´s experimental data supports this contention. In their first reply the original authors offer arguments and counterexamples to further support their case. In further comments J.R. Wait states that he has not altered his views on the matter as expounded in the letter. In a second reply Wu and Thiel elaborate on experimental details omitted in the original work, which it is hoped will clarify the previous explanations they presented.<>
Keywords
geophysical equipment; geophysical prospecting; terrestrial electricity; electric field sensors; electromagnetic sounding; geophysical equipment; horizontal E fields; horizontal insulated antenna; magnetic field; prospecting; surface impedance; ungrounded antenna; Acoustic sensors; Directive antennas; Earth; Electromagnetic fields; Impedance; Insulation; Magnetic field measurement; Receiving antennas; Transmitting antennas; Voltage;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0196-2892
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/36.35968
Filename
35968
Link To Document