• DocumentCode
    1237900
  • Title

    Comments, with reply, on "Electric field sensors in electromagnetic sounding" by Wu Xiao Wu and David V. Thiel

  • Author

    Wait, James R.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Arizona Univ., Tucson, AZ, USA
  • Volume
    27
  • Issue
    6
  • fYear
    1989
  • Firstpage
    789
  • Lastpage
    792
  • Abstract
    The conclusion by W.X. Wu and D.V. Thiel (see ibid., vol.27, p.24-27, Jan. 1989) that a horizontal, insulated, ungrounded antenna is a dependable probe for the horizontal E fields is questioned. It is shown that the horizontal insulated antenna should be grounded at the end points to provide a reliable measurement of the actual surface impedance in conjunction with the measurement of the horizontal magnetic field. Wu and Thiel´s experimental data supports this contention. In their first reply the original authors offer arguments and counterexamples to further support their case. In further comments J.R. Wait states that he has not altered his views on the matter as expounded in the letter. In a second reply Wu and Thiel elaborate on experimental details omitted in the original work, which it is hoped will clarify the previous explanations they presented.<>
  • Keywords
    geophysical equipment; geophysical prospecting; terrestrial electricity; electric field sensors; electromagnetic sounding; geophysical equipment; horizontal E fields; horizontal insulated antenna; magnetic field; prospecting; surface impedance; ungrounded antenna; Acoustic sensors; Directive antennas; Earth; Electromagnetic fields; Impedance; Insulation; Magnetic field measurement; Receiving antennas; Transmitting antennas; Voltage;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0196-2892
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/36.35968
  • Filename
    35968