• DocumentCode
    1275585
  • Title

    Study on the Spatial Resolution of Single and Multiple Coincidences Compton Camera

  • Author

    Andreyev, Andriy ; Sitek, Arkadiusz ; Celler, Anna

  • Author_Institution
    Med. Imaging Res. Group, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  • Volume
    59
  • Issue
    5
  • fYear
    2012
  • Firstpage
    1920
  • Lastpage
    1926
  • Abstract
    In this paper we study the image resolution that can be obtained from the Multiple Coincidences Compton Camera (MCCC). The principle of MCCC is based on a simultaneous acquisition of several gamma-rays emitted in cascade from a single nucleus. Contrary to a standard Compton camera, MCCC can theoretically provide the exact location of a radioactive source (based only on the identification of the intersection point of three cones created by a single decay), without complicated tomographic reconstruction. However, practical implementation of the MCCC approach encounters several problems, such as low detection sensitivities result in very low probability of coincident triple gamma-ray detection, which is necessary for the source localization. It is also important to evaluate how the detection uncertainties (finite energy and spatial resolution) influence identification of the intersection of three cones, thus the resulting image quality. In this study we investigate how the spatial resolution of the reconstructed images using the triple-cone reconstruction (TCR) approach compares to images reconstructed from the same data using standard iterative method based on single-cone. Results show, that FWHM for the point source reconstructed with TCR was 20-30% higher than the one obtained from the standard iterative reconstruction based on expectation maximization (EM) algorithm and conventional single-cone Compton imaging. Finite energy and spatial resolutions of the MCCC detectors lead to errors in conical surfaces definitions (“thick” conical surfaces) which only amplify in image reconstruction when intersection of three cones is being sought. Our investigations show that, in spite of being conceptually appealing, the identification of triple cone intersection constitutes yet another restriction of the multiple coincidence approach which limits the image resolution that can be obtained with MCCC and TCR algorithm.
  • Keywords
    Compton effect; cameras; coincidence techniques; gamma-ray detection; image reconstruction; image resolution; particle detectors; radioactive sources; EM algorithm; FWHM; MCCC approach practical implementation; MCCC detectors; MCCC principle; TCR algorithm; TCR approach; coincident triple gamma-ray detection uncertainties; complicated tomographic reconstruction; conical surface definitions; conventional single-cone Compton imaging; expectation maximization algorithm; finite energy; gamma-ray emission simultaneous acquisition; image resolution limits; low detection sensitivity result; multiple coincidence Compton camera spatial resolution; multiple coincidence approach restriction; point source reconstruction; radioactive source exact location; reconstructed images; resulting image quality; single coincidence Compton camera spatial resolution; single decay; single nucleus; source localization; standard Compton camera; standard iterative method; standard iterative reconstruction; thick conical surfaces; three cone intersection; three cone intersection point identification; triple-cone reconstruction approach; very low probability; Cameras; Detectors; Image reconstruction; Position measurement; Spatial resolution; Surface reconstruction; Uncertainty; Compton camera; image reconstruction; image resolution;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Nuclear Science, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0018-9499
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TNS.2012.2208762
  • Filename
    6289400