• DocumentCode
    1279351
  • Title

    Delay- and Disruption-Tolerant Networking (DTN): An Alternative Solution for Future Satellite Networking Applications

  • Author

    Caini, Carlo ; Cruickshank, Haitham ; Farrell, Stephen ; Marchese, Mario

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Electron., Comput. Sci., & Syst. (DEIS), Univ. of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  • Volume
    99
  • Issue
    11
  • fYear
    2011
  • Firstpage
    1980
  • Lastpage
    1997
  • Abstract
    Satellite communications are characterized by long delays, packet losses, and sometimes intermittent connectivity and link disruptions. The TCP/IP stack is ineffective against these impairments and even dedicated solutions, such as performance enhancing proxies (PEPs), can hardly tackle the most challenging environments, and create compatibility issues with current security protocols. An alternative solution arises from the delay- and disruption-tolerant networking (DTN) architecture, which specifies an overlay protocol, called bundle protocol (BP), on top of either transport protocols (TCP, UDP, etc.), or of lower layer protocols (Bluetooth, Ethernet, etc.). The DTN architecture provides long-term information storage on intermediate nodes, suitable for coping with disrupted links, long delays, and intermittent connectivity. By dividing the end-to-end path into multiple DTN hops, in a way that actually extends the TCP-splitting concept exploited in most PEPs, DTN allows the use of specialized protocols on the satellite (or space) links. This paper discusses the prospects for use of DTN in future satellite networks. We present a broad DTN overview, to make the reader familiar with the characteristics that differentiate DTN from ordinary TCP/IP networking, compare the DTN and PEP architectures and stacks, as a preliminary step for the subsequent DTN performance assessment carried out in practical LEO/GEO satellite scenarios. DTN security is studied next, examining the advantages over present satellite architectures, the threats faced in satellite scenarios, and also open issues. Finally, the relation between DTN and quality of service (QoS) is investigated, by focusing on QoS architectures and QoS tools and by discussing the state of the art of DTN research activity in modeling, routing, and congestion control.
  • Keywords
    delays; quality of service; routing protocols; satellite links; telecommunication congestion control; telecommunication security; transport protocols; BP; DTN; PEP; QoS; TCP-IP stack; bundle protocol; congestion control; delay-tolerant networking; disruption-tolerant networking; intermittent connectivity; link disruption; lower layer protocol; overlay protocol; packet loss; performance enhancing proxy; practical LEO-GEO satellite scenario; quality of service; routing activity; satellite links; satellite networking application; security protocol; transport protocol; Delay; IP networks; Internet; Loss measurement; Packet switching; Quality of service; Satellite communication; Delay- and disruption-tolerant networking (DTN); performance enhancing proxies (PEPs); quality of service (QoS); satellite communications; security;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Proceedings of the IEEE
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0018-9219
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/JPROC.2011.2158378
  • Filename
    5959951