DocumentCode
1345854
Title
Fault Trees, Prime Implicants, and Noncoherence
Author
Locks, Mitchell O.
Author_Institution
Dept. of Administrative Sciences; Oklahoma State University; Stillwater, Oklahoma 74074 USA.
Issue
2
fYear
1980
fDate
6/1/1980 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage
130
Lastpage
135
Abstract
The K&H algorithm for finding the p.i.´s of a noncoherent fault tree is too long and complicated for the purpose. The example that was used by K&H to illustrate the algorithm is reworked with known methods to show that alternatives are available that require less work. This correspondence is a series of four letters published as a sequel to a paper by Kumamoto & Henley (K&H) that presented an ``algorithm based on top-down analysis particularly designed for noncoherent fault trees´´. The first of these letters is by Locks, claiming that the article is too complicated and that a shorter procedure is available. This is followed by Reply #1 by Ogunbiyi and Reply #2 by K&H. The note is concluded with a rebuttal by Locks to both replies.
Keywords
Algorithm design and analysis; Boolean algebra; Boolean functions; Circuit synthesis; Fault trees; Flowcharts; Logic functions; Performance analysis; Reliability; Terminology; Boolean indicators; Boolean logic; Computer aid; Consenus operation; Fault tree; Minimal cut; Prime implicants; Top-down algorithm; s-Coherence;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Reliability, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0018-9529
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TR.1980.5220752
Filename
5220752
Link To Document