• DocumentCode
    1381568
  • Title

    Passive Versus Aggressive Strategies: A Game Theoretic Analysis of Military and Immune Defense

  • Author

    Bewick, S. ; Mingjun Zhang ; Hamel, William

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Mech., Aerosp. & Biomed. Eng., Univ. of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA
  • Volume
    41
  • Issue
    3
  • fYear
    2011
  • fDate
    5/1/2011 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    583
  • Lastpage
    588
  • Abstract
    This paper describes a basic passive-versus-aggressive defense model and analyzes it in terms of defense strategies against an intelligent enemy. In response to varying combinations of passive and aggressive defense, we assume that the enemy can up or down regulate the growth activity. This leads to a differential game formulation of battle scenarios. First, we examine military counterterrorist activities in a civilian population. We then consider immune defense against hepatitis B in the liver. The underlying principles in these two examples are similar, although the model features are slightly different. Simulation results are provided to demonstrate the benefits and limitations of the proposed model in terms of understanding biological systems and developing strategic army defense plans.
  • Keywords
    differential games; diseases; military systems; differential game formulation; game theoretic analysis; hepatitis B; immune defense; liver; military counterterrorist activities; military defense; passive versus aggressive defense model; Biological system modeling; Delay; Games; Immune system; Liver; Mathematical model; Recruitment; Differential game theory; immune system; military counterterrorist initiatives; modeling; simulation;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    1083-4427
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TSMCA.2010.2087748
  • Filename
    5638771