DocumentCode
139822
Title
Impact of head modeling and sensor types in localizing human gamma-band oscillations
Author
Mideksa, K.G. ; Hoogenboom, N. ; Hellriegel, H. ; Krause, H. ; Schnitzler, A. ; Deuschl, Guunther ; Raethjen, J. ; Heute, Ulrich ; Muthuraman, Muthuraman
Author_Institution
Inst. for Digital Signal Process. & Syst. Theor., Christian-Albrechts-Univ. of Kiel, Kiel, Germany
fYear
2014
fDate
26-30 Aug. 2014
Firstpage
2217
Lastpage
2220
Abstract
An effective mechanism in neuronal communication is oscillatory neuronal synchronization. The neuronal gamma-band (30-100 Hz) synchronization is associated with attention which is induced by a certain visual stimuli. Numerous studies have shown that the gamma-band activity is observed in the visual cortex. However, impact of different head modeling techniques and sensor types to localize gamma-band activity have not yet been reported. To do this, the brain activity was recorded using 306 magnetoencephalography (MEG) sensors, consisting of 102 magnetometers and 102 pairs of planar gradiometers (one measuring the derivative of the magnetic field along the latitude and the other along the longitude), and the data were analyzed with respect to time, frequency, and location of the strongest response. The spherical head models with a single-shell and overlapping spheres (local sphere) have been used as a forward model for calculating the external magnetic fields generated from the gamma-band activity. For each sensor type, the subject-specific frequency range of the gamma-band activity was obtained from the spectral analysis. The identified frequency range of interest with the highest gamma-band activity is then localized using a spatial-filtering technique known as dynamic imaging of coherent sources (DICS). The source analysis for all the subjects revealed that the gradiometer sensors which measure the derivative along the longitude, showed sources close to the visual cortex (cuneus) as compared to the other gradiometer sensors which measure the derivative along the latitude. However, using the magnetometer sensors, it was not possible to localize the sources in the region of interest. When comparing the two head models, the local-sphere model helps in localizing the source more focally as compared to the single-shell head model.
Keywords
bioelectric potentials; cellular biophysics; data analysis; magnetoencephalography; magnetometers; medical signal detection; medical signal processing; neurophysiology; physiological models; spatial filters; spectral analysis; synchronisation; DICS; brain activity recording; data analysis; dynamic imaging of coherent sources; external magnetic field generation; frequency 30 Hz to 100 Hz; gradiometer sensors; human gamma-band oscillation localization; magnetoencephalography sensors; magnetometer sensors; neuronal gamma-band; oscillatory neuronal communication; oscillatory neuronal synchronization; single-shell head model; spatial-filtering technique; spectral analysis; spherical head models; visual cortex; visual stimuli; Brain models; Head; Magnetic heads; Magnetometers; Time-frequency analysis; Visualization;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE
Conference_Location
Chicago, IL
ISSN
1557-170X
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944059
Filename
6944059
Link To Document