DocumentCode
1524561
Title
Humpback whale song or humpback whale sonar? A reply to Au et al
Author
Mercado, Eduardo, III ; Frazer, L. Neil
Author_Institution
Center for Molecular & Behavioral Neurosci., Rutgers Univ., Newark, NJ, USA
Volume
26
Issue
3
fYear
2001
fDate
7/1/2001 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage
406
Lastpage
415
Abstract
Au et al.´s arguments against the hypothesis that humpback whale songs function as long-range sonar are based on questionable assumptions rather than on empirical data. Like other echolocating mammals (e.g., bats), singing humpback whales: 1) localize targets in the absence of visual information; 2) possess a highly innervated peripheral auditory system; and 3) modulate the temporal and spectral features of their sounds based on environmental conditions. The sonar equation is inadequate for determining whether humpback whale songs generate detectable echoes from other whales because it does not account for temporal variables that can strongly affect the detectability of echoes. In particular, the sonar equation ignores the fact that much of the noise encountered by singing humpback whales is spectrally and temporally predictable, and that audition in mammals is a dynamic and plastic process. Experiments are needed to test the hypothesis that singing humpback whales listen for and respond to echoes generated by their songs
Keywords
biocommunications; sonar; zoology; echoes detectability; echolocating mammals; highly innervated peripheral auditory system; humpback whale sonar; humpback whale song; sonar equation; spectral features; temporal variables; Acoustic noise; Adaptive signal detection; Animals; Auditory system; Equations; Gold; Predictive models; Sonar detection; Testing; Whales;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Oceanic Engineering, IEEE Journal of
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0364-9059
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/48.946514
Filename
946514
Link To Document