• DocumentCode
    1524561
  • Title

    Humpback whale song or humpback whale sonar? A reply to Au et al

  • Author

    Mercado, Eduardo, III ; Frazer, L. Neil

  • Author_Institution
    Center for Molecular & Behavioral Neurosci., Rutgers Univ., Newark, NJ, USA
  • Volume
    26
  • Issue
    3
  • fYear
    2001
  • fDate
    7/1/2001 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    406
  • Lastpage
    415
  • Abstract
    Au et al.´s arguments against the hypothesis that humpback whale songs function as long-range sonar are based on questionable assumptions rather than on empirical data. Like other echolocating mammals (e.g., bats), singing humpback whales: 1) localize targets in the absence of visual information; 2) possess a highly innervated peripheral auditory system; and 3) modulate the temporal and spectral features of their sounds based on environmental conditions. The sonar equation is inadequate for determining whether humpback whale songs generate detectable echoes from other whales because it does not account for temporal variables that can strongly affect the detectability of echoes. In particular, the sonar equation ignores the fact that much of the noise encountered by singing humpback whales is spectrally and temporally predictable, and that audition in mammals is a dynamic and plastic process. Experiments are needed to test the hypothesis that singing humpback whales listen for and respond to echoes generated by their songs
  • Keywords
    biocommunications; sonar; zoology; echoes detectability; echolocating mammals; highly innervated peripheral auditory system; humpback whale sonar; humpback whale song; sonar equation; spectral features; temporal variables; Acoustic noise; Adaptive signal detection; Animals; Auditory system; Equations; Gold; Predictive models; Sonar detection; Testing; Whales;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Oceanic Engineering, IEEE Journal of
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0364-9059
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/48.946514
  • Filename
    946514