DocumentCode
1525774
Title
Multifeature Landmark-Free Active Appearance Models: Application to Prostate MRI Segmentation
Author
Toth, R. ; Madabhushi, A.
Author_Institution
Dept. of Biomed. Eng., Rutgers Univ., Piscataway, NJ, USA
Volume
31
Issue
8
fYear
2012
Firstpage
1638
Lastpage
1650
Abstract
Active shape models (ASMs) and active appearance models (AAMs) are popular approaches for medical image segmentation that use shape information to drive the segmentation process. Both approaches rely on image derived landmarks (specified either manually or automatically) to define the object´s shape, which require accurate triangulation and alignment. An alternative approach to modeling shape is the level-set representation, defined as a set of signed distances to the object´s surface. In addition, using multiple image derived attributes (IDAs) such as gradient information has previously shown to offer improved segmentation results when applied to ASMs, yet little work has been done exploring IDAs in the context of AAMs. In this work, we present a novel AAM methodology that utilizes the level set implementation to overcome the issues relating to specifying landmarks, and locates the object of interest in a new image using a registration based scheme. Additionally, the framework allows for incorporation of multiple IDAs. Our multifeature landmark-free AAM (MFLAAM) utilizes an efficient, intuitive, and accurate algorithm for identifying those IDAs that will offer the most accurate segmentations. In this paper, we evaluate our MFLAAM scheme for the problem of prostate segmentation from T2-w MRI volumes. On a cohort of 108 studies, the levelset MFLAAM yielded a mean Dice accuracy of 88% ± 5%, and a mean surface error of 1.5 mm ± .8 mm with a segmentation time of 150/s per volume. In comparison, a state of the art AAM yielded mean Dice and surface error values of 86% ± 9% and 1.6 mm ± 1.0 mm, respectively. The differences with respect to our levelset-based MFLAAM model are statistically significant (p <; .05). In addition, our results were in most cases superior to several recent state of the art prostate MRI segmentation methods.
Keywords
biological organs; biomedical MRI; image registration; image segmentation; medical image processing; active shape models; gradient information; image derived attributes; image derived landmarks; image registration based scheme; image segmentation; level-set representation; multifeature landmark free AAM; multifeature landmark free active appearance models; prostate MRI segmentation; Active appearance model; Image reconstruction; Image segmentation; Indexes; Magnetic resonance imaging; Principal component analysis; Shape; Active appearance models; active shape models; levelsets; principal component analysis (PCA); prostate segmentation; Algorithms; Databases, Factual; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Models, Statistical; Principal Component Analysis; Prostate;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0278-0062
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TMI.2012.2201498
Filename
6205628
Link To Document