• DocumentCode
    1628812
  • Title

    Test Results of the 7 OHM, 2.5 MV, Laser Triggered PFL for the HYDRUS IVA

  • Author

    Corcoran, P. ; Carboni, V. ; Kishi, H. ; Whitney, B. ; Sanders, P. ; Hanzel, K. ; Broff, R. ; Smith, I. ; Pearce, J. ; Stevens, R. ; Bailey, V. ; Douglas, J. ; Thomas, K. ; Bockle, M. ; Myall, M. ; Swierkosz, M.

  • Author_Institution
    L-3 Pulse Sci., San Leandro
  • fYear
    2007
  • Firstpage
    758
  • Lastpage
    758
  • Abstract
    A prototype PFL was tested in a test bed at L-3 as part of the recently completed IVA design effort for flash radiographic sources in the new Hydrus hydrodynamics research facility at AWE. The prototype PFL represented one of the ten PFLs in the baseline IVA configuration. The 7 ohm water filled, coaxial PFL incorporates a laser triggered output switch followed by a self-breaking water sharpening switch near the end of the output line to produce a 60 ns long pulse which rises in less than 10 ns. A pre-existing Marx was modified to charge the PFL to nominally 2.5MV in 1.5 micro-seconds to match the charge rate predicted for the full IVA circuit. In addition to the PFL hardware, the other parts of the IVA that were prototyped and tested included the Marx oil/oil diaphragm, a section of the multi-port, 50 ohm oil filled manifold, and the oil-filled input and output elbows. The PFL was tested up to 3MV in the prototype facility to accelerate the reliability tests. The performance and reliability test results for the PFL and oil filled lines based on >2730 shots are presented in this paper. The test results for the LTGS along with the switch type down-selection are presented separately at this conference. The empirically based reliability of the PFL and other components that were tested is compared to the goals set out by the formal availability, reliability, and maintainability (ARM) assessment for the whole IVA. The reliability calculations for the PFL utilize an equivalent number of nominal voltage shots to take into account the higher electrical stress of the over-voltage shots. The PFL output waveform is compared to the design prediction and circuit models that match the measured performance are presented. Problems and failures that were encountered during the course of testing are discussed along with their solutions, fixes, and mitigations.
  • Keywords
    plasma X-ray sources; plasma production by laser; pulse generators; pulsed power supplies; ARM assessment; AWE; Hydrus hydrodynamics research facility; Marx generator; PFL output waveform; flash radiographic sources; inductive voltage adder; laser triggered PFL; laser triggered output switch; oil filled lines; over-voltage shots; pulse forming line; resistance 7 ohm; self-breaking water sharpening switch; voltage 2.5 MV; water filled coaxial PFL; Circuit testing; Coaxial components; Elbow; Hardware; Hydrodynamics; Optical pulses; Petroleum; Prototypes; Radiography; Switches;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Plasma Science, 2007. ICOPS 2007. IEEE 34th International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Albuquerque, NM
  • ISSN
    0730-9244
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-0915-0
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/PPPS.2007.4346064
  • Filename
    4346064