• DocumentCode
    1673546
  • Title

    A comparison of bidomain and monodomain models in calculating the cardiac extracellular potentials induced by an external field

  • Author

    Huang, Qiuju ; Claydon, Frank J.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Biomed. Eng., Memphis Univ., TN, USA
  • fYear
    1996
  • Firstpage
    225
  • Lastpage
    228
  • Abstract
    The objective of this study is to compare the cardiac extracellular potentials due to an external field, as predicted by three different models. The three models are: (1) a monodomain isotropic model; (2) a monodomain anisotropic model; and (3) a bidomain anisotropic model. The myocardium is modeled as a spherical shell with the curved and rotating cardiac fibers characterized by conductivity tensors. The field-induced potentials are calculated using 3-D finite element methods. The cardiac potentials predicted by the monodomain and bidomain anisotropic models differ by less than 5% RMS. Those predicted by the monodomain isotropic model, however, can differ from the bidomain model by as much as 21% RMS. The results suggest that (1) including cardiac fiber anisotropy has a considerable effect on the accuracy of the model, and (2) little is gained by using the complex bidomain model when calculating the extracellular potentials.
  • Keywords
    bioelectric potentials; biological effects of fields; cardiology; cellular effects of radiation; electric field effects; finite element analysis; physiological models; bidomain anisotropic model; cardiac electrophysiology; cardiac extracellular potentials calculation; cardiac fiber anisotropy; conductivity tensors; external field; monodomain anisotropic model; monodomain isotropic model; rotating cardiac fibers; spherical shell; Anisotropic magnetoresistance; Blood; Conductivity; Extracellular; Heart; Muscles; Myocardium; Predictive models; Solid modeling; Torso;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Computers in Cardiology, 1996
  • Conference_Location
    Indianapolis, IN, USA
  • ISSN
    0276-6547
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-3710-7
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/CIC.1996.542514
  • Filename
    542514