• DocumentCode
    1687230
  • Title

    Counterexample-guided abstraction refinement

  • Author

    Clarke, Edmund

  • Author_Institution
    Sch. of Comput. Sci., Carnegie Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, PA, USA
  • fYear
    2003
  • Firstpage
    7
  • Lastpage
    8
  • Abstract
    The main practical problem in model checking is the combinatorial explosion of system states commonly known as the state explosion problem. Abstraction methods attempt to reduce the size of the state space by employing knowledge about the system and the specification in order to model only relevant features in the Kripke structure. Counterexample-guided abstraction refinement is an automatic abstraction method where, starting with a relatively small skeletal representation of the system to be verified, increasingly precise abstract representations of the system are computed. The key step is to extract information from false negatives ("spurious counterexamples") due to over-approximation.
  • Keywords
    formal specification; state-space methods; Kripke structure; automatic abstraction method; counterexample-guided abstraction refinement; model checking; spurious counterexamples; state explosion problem; state space; Boolean functions; Collaboration; Computer science; Concrete; Contracts; Data mining; Data structures; Explosions; State-space methods; US Department of Defense;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Temporal Representation and Reasoning, 2003 and Fourth International Conference on Temporal Logic. Proceedings. 10th International Symposium on
  • ISSN
    1530-1311
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7695-1912-1
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/TIME.2003.1214874
  • Filename
    1214874