• DocumentCode
    1855579
  • Title

    Segmentation of medical imagery with pulse-coupled neural networks

  • Author

    Keller, Paul E. ; McKinnon, A. David

  • Author_Institution
    Battelle Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA, USA
  • Volume
    4
  • fYear
    1999
  • fDate
    1999
  • Firstpage
    2659
  • Abstract
    This paper discusses some of the advantages and disadvantages of pulse-coupled neural networks (PCNNs) for performing image segmentation in the realm of medical diagnostics. PCNNs were tested with magnetic resonance imagery (MRI) of the brain and abdominal region and nuclear scintigraphic ventilation/perfusion imagery of the lungs (V/Q scans). Our preliminary results show that PCNNs do well at contrast enhancement. They also do well at image segmentation when each segment is approximately uniform in intensity. However, there are limits to what PCNNs can do. For example, when intensity significantly varies across a single segment, that segment does not properly separate from other objects. Another difficulty is finding the optimum parameter values so that a uniform response is achieved over a set of imagery. Also, a set of parameters that properly segments objects in one image is sometimes unsuccessful on a similar image
  • Keywords
    biomedical MRI; image segmentation; medical image processing; neural nets; V/Q scans; image segmentation; magnetic resonance imagery; medical image processing; pulse-coupled neural networks; ventilation/perfusion imagery; Abdomen; Biological neural networks; Biomedical imaging; Image segmentation; Magnetic resonance; Magnetic resonance imaging; Medical diagnosis; Medical diagnostic imaging; Neural networks; Testing;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Neural Networks, 1999. IJCNN '99. International Joint Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Washington, DC
  • ISSN
    1098-7576
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-5529-6
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/IJCNN.1999.833497
  • Filename
    833497