DocumentCode
1861885
Title
Truncated multigrid versus pre-corrected FFT/AIM for bioelectromagnetics: When is O(N) better than O(NlogN)?
Author
Yang, Kai ; Wei, Fangzhou ; Yilmaz, Ali E.
Author_Institution
Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
fYear
2011
fDate
10-13 Aug. 2011
Firstpage
153
Lastpage
158
Abstract
The effectiveness of multigrid and fast Fourier transform (FFT) based methods are investigated for accelerating the solution of volume integral equations encountered in bioelectromagnetics (BIOEM) analysis. The typical BIOEM simulation is in the mixed-frequency regime of analysis because the field variations in the simulation domain are dictated by a combination of the free space wavelength, geometrical features, and the wavelengths/skin depths in tissues. In this case, multigrid-based methods (when appropriately truncated at high-frequency levels) can achieve O(N) complexity that is asymptotically superior to the O(NlogN) complexity of FFT-based ones. Nevertheless, the constant in front of their asymptotic complexity estimate is larger and their accuracy-efficiency tradeoffs are different. Numerical experiments are performed to compare these methods and the results show that multigrid-based methods begin to outperform FFT-based ones for N~103.
Keywords
bioelectric phenomena; biomagnetism; electromagnetic fields; fast Fourier transforms; integral equations; bioelectromagnetics; fast Fourier transform; precorrected FFT/AIM; truncated multigrid; volume integral equations; Biological system modeling; Interpolation; Memory management; Observers; Scattering; Skin; Sparse matrices;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Computational Electromagnetics International Workshop (CEM), 2011
Conference_Location
Izmir
Print_ISBN
978-1-4577-1685-0
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/CEM.2011.6047351
Filename
6047351
Link To Document