DocumentCode
1970135
Title
Ad hoc network metrics: Which is best?
Author
Qian Zhang ; Matolak, David W.
Author_Institution
Ohio Univ., Athens, OH, USA
fYear
2012
fDate
3-7 Dec. 2012
Firstpage
38
Lastpage
43
Abstract
The area of wireless ad hoc networks has attracted much attention and gained great popularity in the last few years. Yet researchers are still investigating several metrics to evaluate ad hoc network performance. Furthermore, to our knowledge, no work has been published to address the comparison of different network metrics. In this paper, we analyze and compare several distinct network metrics including transport capacity, transmission capacity and network diameter, which quantify ad hoc network performance from different perspectives. We also evaluate the network metrics via simulation for two “extreme” routing strategies: “nearest neighbor” (NN) and “shortest path” (SP). Main conclusions are that the transport capacity and the transmission capacity are generally inversely related in ad hoc networks; SP routing can achieve larger transport capacity and smaller network diameter than NN routing, whereas NN routing results in larger transmission capacity than SP routing. Ultimately, the best network metric among these three depends upon application; more research is needed in this important area.
Keywords
ad hoc networks; telecommunication network routing; NN routing; SP routing; SP routing strategies; distinct network metrics; nearest neighbor; network diameter; shortest path; transmission capacity; transport capacity; wireless ad hoc network metrics; multi-hop relay; network metrics; routing strategies; wireless ad hoc networks;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), 2012 IEEE
Conference_Location
Anaheim, CA
ISSN
1930-529X
Print_ISBN
978-1-4673-0920-2
Electronic_ISBN
1930-529X
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/GLOCOM.2012.6503087
Filename
6503087
Link To Document