DocumentCode
1993651
Title
Evaluation study of fast spectral estimators using in-vivo data
Author
Hansen, K.L. ; Gran, F. ; Pedersen, M.M. ; Holfort, I.K. ; Jensen, J.A. ; Nielsen, M.B.
fYear
2009
fDate
20-23 Sept. 2009
Firstpage
1359
Lastpage
1362
Abstract
Spectrograms in medical ultrasound are usually estimated with Welch´s method (WM). To achieve sufficient spectral resolution and contrast, WM uses an observation window (OW) of up to 256 emissions per estimate. Two adaptive filterbank methods have been suggested to reduce the OW: Blood spectral Power Capon (BPC) and the Blood Amplitude and Phase EStimation method (BAPES). Ten volunteers were scanned over the carotid artery. From each dataset, 28 spectrograms were produced by combining four approaches (WM with a Hanning window (W.HAN), WM with a boxcar window (W.BOX), BPC and BAPES) and seven OWs (128, 64, 32, 16, 8, 4, 2). The full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM) and the ratio between main and side lobe levels were calculated for each spectrogram. Furthermore, all 280 randomized spectrograms were presented to nine radiologists for visual evaluation: useful/not useful. BAPES and BPC compared to WM had better resolution (lower FWHM) for all OW<128 while only BAPES compared to WM had improved contrast (higher ratio). According to the scores given by the radiologists, BAPES, BPC and W.HAN performed equally well (p>0.05) at OW 128 and 64, while W.BOX scored less (p<0.05). At OW 32, BAPES and BPC performed better than WM (p<0.0001) and BAPES was significantly superior to BPC at OW 16 (p=0.0002) and 8 (p<0.0001). BPC at OW 32 (p=0.29) and BAPES at OW 16 (p=0.55) scored as at OW 128. WM at OW 16 and 8 failed as the four methods at OW 4 and 2. The intra-observer variability tested for three radiologist showed on average good agreement (90%, ?=0.79) and inter-observer variability showed moderate agreement (78%, ?=0.56). The overall result indicates that BPC and BAPES have better resolution and BAPES better contrast than WM, and that OW can be reduced to 32 using BPC and 16 using BAPES without reducing the usefulness of the spectrogram. This could potentially increase the temporal resolution of the spectrogram or the frame rate of the interleaved B-mode image- - s.
Keywords
biomedical ultrasonics; blood; blood vessels; phase estimation; BAPES; BPC; Welch method; blood spectral power capon; interbank methods; medical ultrasound; observation window; phase estimation method; spectral resolution; spectrograms; visual evaluation; Adaptive filters; Biomedical imaging; Blood; Filter bank; Image resolution; Phase estimation; Power filters; Radiology; Spectrogram; Ultrasonic imaging;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), 2009 IEEE International
Conference_Location
Rome
ISSN
1948-5719
Print_ISBN
978-1-4244-4389-5
Electronic_ISBN
1948-5719
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ULTSYM.2009.5441525
Filename
5441525
Link To Document